Author Archives: philpeacecenternet

NO WAR ON CUBA! END THE GENOCIDAL U.S. BLOCKADE!

Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (BAYAN) – Statement
June 1 at 10:38 PM

From the Treaty of Paris to Revolution and Sovereignty

Like the Philippines, Cuba emerged from the wreckage of the 1898 Treaty of Paris, when a declining Spanish empire handed over colonized peoples to an ascendant U.S. imperial power. Yet while the Filipino people’s anti-colonial revolution confronted violent U.S. conquest and the imposition of a neocolonial order sustained by comprador elites and political dynasties, generations of Filipinos continued to resist—through anti-imperialist, peasant, workers’, Moro, and revolutionary movements that refused capitulation. Cuba’s victorious revolution of 1959 represents not a distant exception, but a living affirmation of what oppressed peoples continue to struggle for.

Under the leadership of Fidel Castro, the July 26 Movement, and generations of revolutionaries, Cuba transformed from a neocolonial appendage of U.S. capital into a sovereign socialist nation committed to human dignity, social welfare, and international solidarity. Today, the Cuban Revolution remains a living rebuke to imperialism: proof that another social order—one based on people’s welfare rather than profit and elite plunder—is possible.

What the United States Is Punishing Cuba For

The United States claims to defend “democracy” while subjecting Cuba to over six decades of siege, sabotage, sanctions, destabilization, and economic warfare. The cruel and illegal blockade—now intensified into an energy embargo that Cuban leaders correctly describe as an act of war—aims to starve the Cuban people into submission.

This punishment is not imposed because Cuba has failed. Cuba is punished precisely because it succeeded in proving that even under relentless attack, a poor and formerly dependent nation can prioritize human needs.

Cuba built universal and free healthcare, free education at all levels, scientific research, cultural development, food security systems, and social indicators that rival wealthy capitalist states. It eradicated illiteracy, dramatically lowered infant mortality, expanded life expectancy, and guaranteed social rights unimaginable for millions living under neoliberal capitalism.

Even amid intensified blockade, Cuba developed its own COVID-19 vaccines, trained doctors, sustained universal public healthcare, and continued investing in renewable energy and public welfare despite shortages deliberately imposed by U.S. aggression.

Cuba’s Revolutionary Internationalism

Cuba never hoarded its achievements for itself. It extended solidarity wherever peoples struggled against colonialism, racism, disease, and exploitation.

Cuba supported liberation struggles across Africa, including Angola, Guinea-Bissau, and Namibia, and contributed materially to the defeat of apartheid in Southern Africa. It sent doctors—not bombs—to countries in need, from Algeria to West Africa during Ebola, from Latin America to Europe during the pandemic.

Its medical brigades have cared for millions in neglected communities abandoned by profit-driven healthcare systems. Through the Latin American School of Medicine (ELAM), Cuba trained thousands of doctors from poor and marginalized communities worldwide—including from the United States itself—who returned home to serve working people. Cuba taught literacy across the Global South and restored sight to millions through Operation Miracle.

While imperialism exports war, Cuba exports solidarity.

Fidel Castro and the Endurance of the Revolution

That Fidel Castro survived more than six hundred documented assassination plots and yet died of natural causes stands as testament not only to his extraordinary leadership, but to the steadfast loyalty and vigilance of the Cuban people in defense of their Revolution. Today, even after Fidel’s passing, imperialism continues its campaign of destabilization and historical erasure. The recent decision of the United States to file charges against former Cuban President and revolutionary leader Raúl Castro over the 1996 downing of aircraft linked to anti-Castro exile operations is not merely a legal maneuver—it is part of an information war aimed at discrediting a leader who helped preserve the socialist path during one of Cuba’s most difficult transitions following Fidel’s death. The charges emerge amid renewed U.S. escalation against Cuba and function as a warning against sovereign defiance.

This pattern is painfully familiar. Across colonies and semi-colonies, leaders who dared to assert national sovereignty and resist imperial domination have been demonized, overthrown, assassinated, or criminalized: Patrice Lumumba, whose assassination occurred with documented Belgian involvement and longstanding evidence of CIA complicity; Thomas Sankara, the revolutionary leader of Burkina Faso assassinated in a coup long associated with reactionary and foreign interests hostile to his anti-imperialist program; Salvador Allende, overthrown in a U.S.-backed coup; and Muammar Gaddafi, whose state was destroyed through NATO intervention. Today, the brazen U.S. abduction and prosecution of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro reveals that imperial punishment against governments that refuse subordination remains very much alive.

Yet Cuba endures. Despite hardship, shortages, blackouts, and intensified sanctions, the Cuban people continue to defend socialism with remarkable resilience, creativity, and collective sacrifice. Through mass participation, solidarity, and the revolutionary principle of the “War of All the People”, Cuba has affirmed that sovereignty belongs to both governments and organized peoples prepared to defend their future.

The Philippine State and the Costs of Neocolonial Rule

The Filipino people know all too well the devastating costs of neocolonialism.

While Cuba defended sovereignty and built social welfare, successive Philippine regimes remained subservient to U.S. imperial dictates—trading national development for debt, militarization, and elite enrichment. Acting as willing instruments of neocolonial rule, Philippine comprador and puppet governments deepened neocolonialism while abandoning millions to poverty, privatized healthcare and education, mass unemployment, hunger, and labor export.

Working poor Filipinos know what is absent in our society: children forced into the streets, inaccessible medicine, underfunded schools, privatized hospitals, and livelihoods sacrificed for elite profit.

Many Filipinos aspire to the kind of social guarantees Cuba fought to build—a society where healthcare and education are rights, not commodities; where children are not abandoned to homelessness; where science serves public welfare; where development is planned for people rather than foreign investors and oligarchs.

Yet instead of pursuing genuine sovereignty and social transformation, successive puppet regimes in the Philippines have intensified militarization and fascist repression in service of imperial interests.

Under U.S.-directed counterinsurgency frameworks, the Filipino people confront extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, terrorist-tagging, red-tagging, political persecution, militarized communities, and draconian laws weaponized against dissent and mass democratic organizing. These are not signs of a strong democracy but symptoms of a neocolonial state fearful of its own people’s aspirations for justice, sovereignty, and meaningful social transformation.

It is precisely because Cuba demonstrated what national sovereignty, mass participation, and people-centered development can achieve that it remains under relentless attack. And it is precisely why progressive, democratic, and anti-imperialist forces in the Philippines continue to defend Cuba—as both an act of international solidarity and an affirmation that another future remains possible.

Imperialist War, the Monroe Doctrine, and the Indo-Pacific War Machine

The renewed aggression against Cuba forms part of a broader imperial strategy.

As Washington reasserts the Monroe Doctrine in Latin America—seeking to neutralize sovereign development projects and punish governments unwilling to submit—it simultaneously expands war preparations in Asia under the manufactured framework of the so-called “Indo-Pacific.”

The Philippines has become a frontline staging ground for U.S. military escalation against China through expanded military bases, war exercises, weapons stockpiling, and foreign troop access. Just as Cuba faces siege in the Caribbean, peoples across Asia are being drawn into dangerous camps for imperial confrontation.

BAYAN rejects this militarization. The Filipino people must not be used as cannon fodder in imperial rivalries while social services collapse and democratic rights are suppressed.

Cuba Is Not Alone

The people of the Philippines know what it means to endure imperial domination, fascist violence, and elite rule. We therefore stand firmly with the Cuban people as they resist economic warfare, military threats, disinformation, and renewed aggression.

The movement for national liberation, democracy, and socialism in the Philippines recognizes Cuba not as an abstraction, but as living proof that oppressed peoples can defend sovereignty and organize society around human need.

We defend Cuba because defending Cuba means defending the possibility of a just future.

BAYAN calls on the Filipino people and the international community to:

Condemn all U.S. threats of military aggression against Cuba;
Demand an immediate end to the genocidal economic and energy blockade;
Oppose the reassertion of the Monroe Doctrine and all forms of imperial intervention in Latin America and the Caribbean;
Reject the militarization of the Philippines and U.S. war preparations in the so-called Indo-Pacific;
Strengthen anti-imperialist solidarity among peoples resisting fascism, militarism, and imperial domination;
Support Cuba’s sovereign right to socialism, self-determination, and national development free from coercion and aggression.

No war on Cuba!

End the genocidal U.S. blockade!

Hands off Cuba!

Reject U.S. militarism from Latin America to the Asia-Pacific!

Long live international anti-imperialist solidarity!

Political prisoners call for peace talks, cite Negros killings as proof of failure of ‘militarist approach’

KAPATID Press Release
May 19, 2026

Former peace negotiation consultants Vicente Ladlad, Adelberto Silva, and Wigberto Villarico, currently detained at Camp Bagong Diwa in Bicutan on what they describe as trumped-up charges, called on the government to resume formal peace talks with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) in the wake of the May 16 killings in Cauayan, Negros Occidental, which they said intensified questions already raised by the April 19 Toboso massacre.

In a statement released through KAPATID, the support group for political prisoners, the imprisoned consultants said: “Far from demonstrating victory, these incidents reveal the failure of a purely militarist approach that seeks to suppress the conflict through force while leaving unaddressed the conditions that continue to drive it.”

They noted that in Cauayan, five alleged members of the New People’s Army (NPA) were reported killed in a series of military encounters, while in Toboso, 19 individuals were earlier reported killed in an operation whose official account has since been challenged by a fact-finding mission conducted by human rights and civil society groups and initial autopsy findings.

The statement cited reports that some of those killed in Toboso included civilians, among them students, a journalist, community organizers, and rural youth. It also referred to claims involving video footage showing one victim alive and unable to fight prior to being killed.

According to the detained consultants, the reported presence of student leaders among those killed in both Toboso and Cauayan is particularly significant as it underscores the “continuing resonance” among the youth of longstanding social grievances that fuel armed resistance, contradicting repeated military pronouncements that the insurgency has already been defeated or rendered politically irrelevant.

The political prisoners said the recurring pattern of armed encounters and killings in Negros highlights the limits of a military-centered strategy and underscores the need for a political resolution to the armed conflict.

They urged the GRP to resume formal peace negotiations with the NDFP, saying the continued violence in Negros reflects the “human cost of a conflict left to fester without political resolution.”

The detained consultants also called for a “clear policy statement affirming commitment to international humanitarian law, including the protection of civilians and the accountability of state forces for violations,” as well as the humanitarian release of elderly and sick political prisoners as a confidence-building measure essential to any credible peace process.

Following is the full statement:

Political prisoners press for accountability and resumption of peace talks in relation to Negros killings. The killings of five alleged members of the New People’s Army (NPA) in a so-called series of armed encounters with government troops in Cauayan, Negros Occidental on May 16, following the Toboso massacre on April 19, further exposes the failure of government claims that the insurgency has been effectively crushed.

For weeks, the government through the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) has maintained that all those killed in Toboso, Negros Occidental on April 19 were combatants. This claim has been called into serious question by the findings of a recent fact-finding mission conducted by human rights and people’s organizations, as well as by the earlier statement of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) that 9 of the 19 individuals killed were civilians while the remaining 10 were NPA members.

These accounts coincide with the naming of civilian victims that include students, a journalist, community organizers, and rural youth. Initial autopsy findings by a forensic pathologist also raised serious questions regarding the military’s version of events, including gunshot wounds sustained from behind.

The presence of student leaders among those killed in Toboso and Cauayan underscores the continuing resonance especially among the youth of the social injustices and conditions that have long fueled armed resistance. Their involvement directly contradicts repeated military pronouncements that the insurgency is already “dead” or has lost all political significance. Far from demonstrating victory, these incidents reveal the bankruptcy of a purely militarist approach that seeks to suppress the conflict through force while leaving unaddressed the conditions that continue to drive it.

These contradictions demand not dismissal but scrutiny. Video footage from the AFP’s own drone cameras posted on social media after the Toboso massacre—later taken down—showed that one of the victims, Roger Fabillar, was alive and in no position to give battle. This indicates that he was summarily killed instead of being taken prisoner.

Despite public outrage, the government’s response has been grossly inadequate. Public statements from defense officials have advanced the untenable position that mere presence in an area where armed encounters occur justifies lethal force or even criminal liability. Such assertions run counter to the fundamental principles of international humanitarian law, particularly the doctrines of distinction, proportionality, and precaution, which the Philippine government is bound to uphold.

Pronouncements from government spokespersons in the wake of the Toboso and Cauayan killings have emphasized military narratives but have not addressed the core questions: how state forces responded upon becoming aware of civilian presence in the areas of operation, what precautions were taken to protect non-combatants, and how accountability will be ensured in compliance with obligations under international humanitarian law.

These gaps are not merely procedural but reflect a deeper policy vacuum. Recent changes in peace process leadership should be seized to move beyond reactive crisis management toward a coherent and principled approach to the armed conflict.
We, former consultants in peace negotiations jailed on trumped-up charges, call on the GRP authorities to take the following urgent and concrete steps:

  1. Support and convene a genuinely independent, transparent, and adequately resourced investigation into the Toboso and Cauayan killings, with full access to evidence and witnesses, and with findings made public.
  2. Issue a clear policy statement affirming its commitment to international humanitarian law, including the protection of civilians and the accountability of state forces for violations.
  3. Resume formal peace talks with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines. Despite the intent to resume peace talks expressed in the joint statement of the representatives of the GRP and the NDFP in Oslo in November 2024, the preparatory meetings stalled due to the GRP’s insistence that the disposition of armed forces be treated as the primary subject, relegating the roots of the armed conflict to the background while setting aside significant agreements already reached by the two parties in earlier peace negotiations.
  4. Recognize that the continued detention of political prisoners—many elderly, sick, or held on manufactured charges—is inseparable from the broader question of peace. Meaningful confidence-building measures, including the release of political prisoners on humanitarian grounds, are essential to any credible peace process.

The massacre in Toboso, including those of civilians and minors, and the subsequent killings in Cauayan, underscore the human cost of a conflict left to fester without political resolution. The GRP must move beyond rhetoric and cosmetic measures that merely manage public perception. It must act decisively, transparently, and in accordance with its obligations under both domestic and international law.

Anything less perpetuates the very conditions that give rise to conflict.

By political prisoners and former NDFP consultants in the peace talks
Vicente Ladlad
Adelberto Silva
Wigberto Villarico

Reference: KAPATID Media Desk
kapatid.media@gmail.com

#ResumePeaceTalks
#JusticeForToboso
#JusticeForCauayan
#FreePoliticalPrisonersPH
#UpholdIHL
#AccountabilityNow


KAPATID, which means brother/sister in Filipino, is a support organization of families and friends of political prisoners in the Philippines that works for their release and the protection of their rights and welfare.

GOVERNMENT REMAINS THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO PEACE WITH GIBO’S REFUSAL FOR PEACE TALKS

Student Christian Movement of the Philippines – SCMP
May 5, 2026

The SCMP scorns the statement of Defense Secretary Gibo Teodoro on the refusal towards peace negotiations with the belligerent CPP-NPA-NDF.

Especially with Gibo’s statement, the Government of the Republic of the Philippines continues to be the biggest obstacle to peace through these reasons:

  1. Refusal for national peace negotiations based on addressing socio-economic concerns and turning into militarized means.
  2. De facto martial law which has caused wanton human rights violations by the Philippine army not only in the Toboso, Negros Occidental massacre but also through, but not limited to, 135 extrajudicial killings, 826 illegal arrests, 57,000 victims of indiscriminate firing, 577 forced or fake surrenders (from Jul 2022-Dec 2025), and many others.
  3. Copying United States’ counter-insurgency through successive “Oplans” including its current reiteration, the NAP-UPD.
  4. Subservient to US’s geopolitical interests, militarization of the region, and heightening the atmosphere of inter-imperialist war.
  5. Continuation of destructive and exploitative economy that benefits foreigners and ruling classes and use of military and police to protect these interests. It is worthy to note that Gibo Teodoro served as Chairman of the Board of Sagittarius Mines, Inc. (SMI), exploiting the mountains in South Cotabato.
  6. Milking “localized peace talks” as cashcows for corruption through fake surrenderees and other rackets by military generals.
  7. Unsolved worsening crises like that of corruption, exorbitant prices, worsening gap between the rich and the poor, and other manifestations of bureaucrat-capitalism.

As prophets of today’s age, we must continue to assert our faith imperative to become peacemakers. These are the signs of the times (Mt. 16:1-3) that we must not ignore. If the government continues to ignore the writings on the wall, it is our duty to pray and act towards just and lasting peace.

Condemn the obstacles to just and lasting peace!

#Just Peace

Christian youth, struggle for just and lasting peace, #joinSCMP: bit.ly/joinSCMP

On the Toboso Killings and the Military’s Pattern of IHL Violations

National Union of People’s Lawyers
Press Statement
25 April 2026

We will not fall for the lies.

When Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro, Jr. asks “why were they there in the first place, if indeed they were students and civilians,” he does more than echo the self-serving narrative of the Philippine Army, he presumes that the poor, the dispossessed, and those who stand with them have no legitimate place in the communities where structural violence is daily life. In the same breath, he threatens legal consequence, suggesting that presence in a peasant community “could constitute aiding and abetting or obstruction of justice.”

The Philippine Army’s 79th Infantry Battalion claims that all 19 individuals killed in the series of firefights that began before dawn on April 19 were armed members of the New People’s Army (NPA). The NPA has publicly stated that only three among the 19 were their members. The identities of the others tell a different story: UP Diliman student leader Alyssa Alano; peasant advocates Maureen Keil Santuyo and Errol Wendel; community journalist RJ Nichole Ledesma, who was reportedly conducting immersion reporting on the impact of solar farm and windmill projects on farming communities in a separate sitio; Filipino-American activist Lyle Prijoles; and several villagers. Their presence in Toboso was a conscious act of solidarity with communities facing landgrabbing, systemic neglect, and the grinding poverty that decades of counterinsurgency have done nothing to address.

AFP Chief of Staff Gen. Romeo Brawner, Jr. distinguished US citizen Chantal Anicoche from Alano, noting that Anicoche was found “not shooting” and was treated humanely, even as humanitarian workers who came to her aid were denied access to her, and even as a vlogger at her discovery site miraculously knew to address her in English upon finding her. In their official statement, the Philippine Army asked: why were they at the site of the encounter — armed and shooting?

These are the right questions to ask:

  • Why would students, journalists, and advocates not be present to live alongside and document the struggles of peasant communities with long histories of landlessness, oppression, and poverty? Is solidarity now a crime?
  • If IHL’s core principles — distinction, proportionality, and precaution — were observed, how is it that 19 people are dead, over 650 residents of Barangays Salamanca and San Jose displaced? What does proportionality mean when a firefight ends with no reported military casualties and 19 dead civilians and alleged combatants alike?
  • Why does the military’s response to civilian scrutiny follow a now-familiar script: stage the scene, control the narrative, then blame the dead for being where they were found?

The military narrative seeks, perhaps, to drown out the tributes from the masses — from those who buried NPA member Roger Fabillar, who apparently had a one-million-peso bounty on his head, and the students, journalists, and activists who rallied in campuses and public places to seek justice for all the victims. After all, the AFP has a documented record of violating International Humanitarian Law against civilians, persons hors de combat, and the dead — staging the remains of alleged fallen fighters in photographs with firearms, flags, and “subversive” documents, or mockingly portraying bodies as “corned beef” on their own social media pages. They have produced Photoshopped photos of “surrendered” rebels for the Task Force Balik Loob program. Disinformation is a weapon they deploy alongside the guns. But as we said, we will not be fooled.

The facts on the ground are still being established. The NUPL awaits the findings of the fact-finding mission conducted by Karapatan and other human rights organizations, and will issue a more detailed legal assessment once those findings are before us. What is already clear, and what no military press release can obscure, is that the circumstances of these killings demand rigorous, independent scrutiny — not the self-investigation of the very institution whose troops carried out the operation, and not the whitewash of an NTF-ELCAC whose mandate is to justify these operations rather than examine them.

We call for a truly independent investigation into the April 19 killings in Toboso with full and unimpeded access for humanitarian workers, independent human rights experts, and the families of the dead. We call for accountability — not just for those who pulled the trigger, but for those who ordered, tolerated, and concealed the killings. We call on the international community to monitor this case closely, as it is not an isolated incident but part of a continuing pattern of IHL violations across the Philippine countryside. ###

Reference:
Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

BAYAN SAYS EDCA IS A US MILITARY BASE

Bagong Alyansang Makabayan
March 4, 2026

Bagong Alyansang Makabayan said officials of the Armed Forces and the Defense Department are lying to the Filipino people by spreading the absurd spin that the “agreed locations” under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) are not US military bases.

EDCA is a treasonous circumvention of the Constitutional prohibition on establishing a foreign military base in the Philippines. It effectively establishes permanent U.S. military bases in disguise, bypassing Constitutional restrictions. Through flexible “Agreed Locations” scattered nationwide for ongoing equipment storage, training, and swift operations, it turns the whole Philippines into a sprawling U.S. military base—well outside the MDT Article II’s scope of joint defense readiness. Furthermore, its operational descriptions resemble how the US uses forward operating bases, or “lily-pad” bases, elsewhere.

Just as these forked-tongue officials say that the Visiting Forces Agreement only allows temporary deployment of US troops inside the country, the truth is that the so-called rotational deployment effectively means permanent presence. In the same way, EDCA sites are only temporary so long as the US decides when and how long these bases remain in Philippine territory.

EDCA is even worse than the rejected RP-US Military Bases Agreement because the US can set up facilities based on its military requirements. There are currently 9 declared EDCA sites, but US military presence and activities are not limited to these sites. The Marcos Jr. government has allowed the US to operate and build facilities in non-EDCA locations such as Subic, Laoag Airport, Batanes, and some parts of Palawan.

EDCA endangers our people’s safety and well-being and undermines national security. US rivals and actual enemies of the US can target US military facilities in EDCA and non-EDCA sites. Even Camp Aguinaldo has a Combined Coordination Center operated by both US and Philippine authorities.

The ongoing crisis in Iran and West Asia is a stark reminder of the need to urgently dismantle the US military facilities in the Philippines, the removal of Typhon and other missile systems, a stop to RP-US military exercises, and the abrogation of military deals—VFA, Mutual Defense Treaty, Mutual Logistics Support Agreement (MLSA)—that violate our sovereignty aside from endangering the lives of Filipinos.

EDCA will certainly be utilized by the US for such critical needs as refueling and storage of weapons to attack other nations. We should not allow the US to use the Philippines as a staging ground for its acts of military intervention and aggression. #


ILPS PHILIPPINES CONDEMNS U.S.-ISRAEL MILITARY ATTACKS ON IRAN, WARNS MARCOS JR. OF DANGERS OF HOSTING U.S. BASES

ILPS Philippines
February 28, 2026

The International League of Peoples’ Struggle (ILPS) Philippines condemns the massive military attacks launched by the U.S. and Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran. These coordinated strikes constitute a blatant act of aggression that gravely escalates tensions in West Asia and pushes the region toward a wider and more destructive war, as Iranian retaliatory attacks on U.S. military bases in Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the U.A.E. have already been reported.

ILPS Philippines added that Iran’s retaliatory attacks on U.S. bases in Gulf countries hosting American military facilities should serve as a stark warning to the Marcos Jr. regime: as host to numerous U.S. military sites and weapons systems, the Philippines could likewise become a target in similar conflicts involving the U.S. Amid escalating tensions in the Asia Pacific due to US assertion of its hegemony, our country risks being drawn into hostilities not of our own making because of its role as a staging ground for foreign forces.

In his statement justifying the attacks, U.S. President Donald Trump described the operation as a necessary and “noble” mission to protect U.S. security over the purported dangers posed by Iran’s nuclear and missile programs. He warned Iranian forces that refusal to surrender would mean “certain death.” Trump has repeatedly framed Iran as a threat that must be obliterated and has urged regime change.

ILPS Philippines rejects this framing. It is the U.S. and Israel, not Iran, that are the biggest threats to regional and global peace and stability. Trump’s rhetoric, portraying an entire nation as a threat because it rejects U.S. intervention and elevating military destruction over diplomatic engagement, echoes past justifications for imperialist interventions that brought death, displacement, and chaos to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and beyond. His claims that bombing will bring “security” are a sham when the real effect is to entrench U.S. geopolitical dominance and advance U.S. economic interests at the expense of millions of lives. Such actions violate the principles of national sovereignty and the right of people to self-determination.

It is clear that the U.S., as the leading imperialist power, seeks to maintain and expand its hegemony in West Asia, a region of immense strategic and economic importance, particularly in global energy supply, trade routes, and geopolitical influence.

ILPS Philippines denounces U.S. imperialism for once again dragging people into war to secure its geopolitical interests. We further denounce the U.S.’s longstanding use of Israel as a proxy to enforce its agenda in West Asia, an imperialist design that fuels the still ongoing genocide in Palestine.

We stand in solidarity with the Iranian people and all people of West Asia resisting U.S. imperialism, foreign intervention, and aggression. We call for the immediate end to all U.S.-Israel military operations against Iran.

We reiterate our demand to the Marcos Jr administration to terminate all military agreements with the U.S., including the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). The Philippines must pursue an independent foreign policy and prioritize peace and regional stability based on mutual respect by ensuring that our territory is never used as a staging ground for wars that endanger our people and undermine our sovereignty.

On the 40th anniversary of EDSA People Power 1


KARAPATAN Statement
February 25, 2026 10:45 AM

On the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the EDSA People Power Uprising this 25th of February 2026, the Filipino people mark the ouster of the Marcos Sr. dictatorship, infamous both for fascist tyranny and for being a kleptocracy. The Marcos Sr. regime notoriously earned a Guinness World Record for “the greatest robbery of a government” for stealing up to US$10 billion in public funds between 1965 and 1986.

Forty years later, Marcos scion Ferdinand Jr. is making sordid headways of his own. Under his rule, there have been 135 victims of extrajudicial killing as well as 85 others who survived attempts on their lives; 17 victims of enforced disappearance; 45 victims of torture; 826 illegal arrests; 908 illegal searches and seizures; and 10,825,864 victims of threats, harassment and intimidation, most of them red- and terror-tagged.

When it comes to thievery, Marcos Jr. is likewise mirroring his bureaucrat capitalist father in the immenseness of the monies stolen. The most recent revelations involve the ₱8-billion kickbacks sourced from massive budget insertions that were reportedly used to fund the candidacies of Marcosian favorites. Marcos Jr.’s leading role in pushing for up to ₱100 billion in budget insertions in the 2025 budget has likewise been exposed. Marcos Jr’s ₱4.5-billion CIF, more than seven times that of Sara Duterte’s CIF and even four times larger than that of his lead intelligence agency, is likewise a hefty source of monies for the Marcoses.

Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is clearly front and center in today’s commemoration of his dictator-father’s ouster because he is now the embodiment of everything the Filipino people abhorred and overthrew that fateful day of February 25, 1986. He is fascist tyranny and bureaucratic corruption personified.

He has attempted to downgrade the significance of the EDSA People Power Uprising in the nation’s history by no longer classifying it as a holiday. This time, he is prohibiting commemorative rallies along EDSA by invoking a repressive martial law-era ban on rallies without permits.

He relies on the so-called opposition to parry the blows as these opportunists focus their attacks only on the Dutertes and lower-ranking bureaucrats and personalities, and turn a blind eye to the evidence linking Marcos Jr. to systematic and large-scale bureaucratic corruption. Worse, these opportunists obliterate the spirit of EDSA by preventing the Filipino people from thinking out of the box on how to replace rotten leaders. In sum, they end up perpetuating the likes of Marcos Jr. and Sara Duterte in power.

But these are acts of desperation.

The spirit of defiance and collective action that was EDSA lives on as the Filipino people confront authoritarianism and corruption unbroken from the time of Marcos Sr. to his son Marcos Jr.

This year’s commemoration of the EDSA People Power Uprising also marks a significant moment in the Filipino people’s continuing struggle for justice and accountability as Marcos Jr.’s fellow tyrant and predecessor Rodrigo Duterte faces charges of crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for the tens of thousands of extrajudicial killings perpetrated under his drug war. It is the second case filed by Filipino victims of human rights violations in a foreign court. In April 1986, victims of Marcos Sr.’s martial law filed a civil suit seeking damages in a Hawaii court and won their case in a landmark ruling nine years later. Like the Hawaii plaintiffs, victims of Duterte’s drug war are confident that the charges of murder and attempted murder levelled against Duterte at the ICC will be confirmed and his case will proceed to trial.

TODAY, FORTY YEARS ON, the people declare “Never Again” to tyranny and corruption whether it is a Marcos or a Duterte in Malacañang.

Forty years on, the people gather in their numbers and march to defy the trampling of their rights.

Forty years on, the people proclaim their sovereign will to choose a government that truly represents their interests.

Condemn the Capture of President Maduro and US Invasion of Venezuela!

International League of Peoples’ Struggle
01/04/2026

Statement of the ILPS

The International League of Peoples’ Struggle vehemently condemns the blatant invasion of Venezuela by US military forces that bombed military and civilian targets and culminated in the illegal capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. This act is the latest in a months-long campaign by the Trump regime to blockade and wage war on the Venezuelan people in order to seize their sovereign land and resources and enact regime change in Venezuela that will bow to US economic interest.

It is unclear as of this writing how many deaths and injuries were caused by the US airstrikes, but what is clear is the complete disregard for civilian lives by the US. This utterly exposes their false justification of acting on behalf of “peace and freedom” for the people of Venezuela. Previous US airstrikes off the coasts of Venezuela and Colombia have already killed over 100 people and damaged the economic livelihood of Venezuela’s fishing sector.

This aggression did not start with Trump’s escalation over the past few months but instead follows years of systematic aggression by the previous Trump, Biden, Obama, and Bush regimes since Venezuela declared its complete independence from US economic dominance of its oil sector and elected Hugo Chavez as President. The capture of Maduro to stand trial within a US court for so-called “Narco Terrorism” mirrors the same fate of Panamanian President Manuel Noriega who, after years of ruling under US patronage, was overthrown and captured during the 1989 US invasion of Panama and tried in the US. This latest act is in line with Trump’s declaration of his “New Monroe Doctrine” that is merely a resurrected name for the same US imperialist strategy to openly confront its economic rivals like China and Russia and maintain its position as number one imperialist power in the world.

The US has repeatedly made clear through its actions that it is the number one violator of international law and most dangerous imperialist in the world today, with the capture of Maduro being just the latest example. This follows the US and Zionist war against Iran, the complete US support for the genocidal Zionist onslaught against Palestine and all of West Asia, recent airstrikes impacting civilian areas of Nigeria, and many more examples of US complete disregard for international law and unbridled violence to desperately hold onto its crumbling position of world imperialist hegemon.

The people of Venezuela are rallying to defend their sovereignty. The masses have taken to the streets en masse and armed themselves to boldly stand up against foreign imperialist aggression to defend their country. The Venezuela government has mobilized to defend the people and respond to the US aggression. The people and government of Venezuela have called on the people of the world to stand in solidarity with their fight to defend their land and the victories of the Bolivarian Revolution. ILPS calls on its members to answer this call and take to the streets and outside of US embassies to express mass indignation against US imperialist aggression. The League stands with the people of Venezuela and the wider region of Latin America and the Caribbean in the defense of sovereignty, economic livelihood, and the struggle for just and lasting peace.

No War On Venezuela!

Stand Against the US-Led Imperialist Offensive in Latin America and the Caribbean!

Take To The Streets!

Signed,

International League of Peoples’ Struggle

Official statement of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on US aggression

Posted on Morning Star
3 January 2026

THE Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela rejects, condemns, and denounces before the international community the extremely grave military aggression carried out by the current Government of the United States of America against Venezuelan territory and population, targeting both civilian and military locations in the city of Caracas, the capital of the Republic, as well as the states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira.

This act constitutes a flagrant violation of the Charter of the United Nations, particularly Articles 1 and 2, which enshrine respect for sovereignty, the legal equality of States, and the prohibition of the use of force. Such aggression threatens international peace and stability, especially in Latin America and the Caribbean, and places the lives of millions of people at serious risk.

The objective of this attack is none other than the seizure of Venezuela’s strategic resources, particularly its oil and mineral wealth, through an attempt to forcibly undermine the Nation’s political independence.

They will not succeed. After more than two hundred years of independence, the people and their legitimate Government remain steadfast in the defense of sovereignty and the inalienable right to determine their own destiny. The attempt to impose a colonial war in order to destroy the republican form of government and force a so-called “regime change,” in alliance with the fascist oligarchy, will fail, just as all previous attempts have failed.

Since 1811, Venezuela has confronted and defeated empires. When foreign powers bombarded our coasts in 1902, President Cipriano Castro proclaimed: “The insolent foot of the foreigner has profaned the sacred soil of the Fatherland.” Today, with the moral strength of Bolivar, Miranda, and our liberators, the Venezuelan people rise once again to defend their independence in the face of imperial aggression.

People to the streets

The Bolivarian Government calls upon all social and political forces of the country to activate mobilization plans and to repudiate this imperialist attack. The people of Venezuela and their Bolivarian National Armed Force, in perfect popular–military–police unity, are fully deployed to guarantee sovereignty and peace. At the same time, the Bolivarian Diplomacy of Peace will submit the corresponding complaints before the United Nations Security Council, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, CELAC, and the Non-Aligned Movement, demanding the condemnation of and accountability from the Government of the United States.

President Nicolas Maduro has ordered all national defence plans to be placed at full readiness, to be implemented at the appropriate time and under the appropriate circumstances, in strict accordance with the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the Organic Law on States of Exception, and the Organic Law on National Security.

Accordingly, President Nicolas Maduro has signed and ordered the implementation of the Decree declaring a State of External Emergency throughout the national territory, in order to protect the rights of the population, ensure the full functioning of republican institutions, and immediately transition to armed struggle. The entire country must be activated to defeat this imperialist aggression.

Likewise, he has ordered the immediate deployment of the Command for the Integral Defence of the Nation and the Integral Defence Leadership Bodies in all states and municipalities of the country.

In strict accordance with Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, Venezuela reserves the right to exercise legitimate self-defence in order to protect its people, its territory, and its independence. We call upon the peoples and governments of Latin America, the Caribbean, and the world to mobilise in active solidarity in the face of this imperial aggression.

As stated by Supreme Commander Hugo Chavez Frías: “In the face of any new circumstance of difficulty, whatever its magnitude, the response of all patriots must be unity, struggle, battle, and victory.”

Caracas, January 3, 2026

CPP orders 4-day Xmas, New Year ceasefire

Raymund B. Villanueva – Kodao.org – News
December 15, 2025

The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) has ordered the New People’s Army (NPA) to implement a four-day ceasefire during Christmas and New Year.

The CPP said the unilateral ceasefire declaration will take effect from midnight of December 25 to one minute before December 27 and again on midnight of New Year’s eve, December 31, until one minute before January 2.

“On the above specified days, all units of the NPA are directed to go into active defense mode especially in the face of relentless military operations of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) against peasant communities and guerrilla fronts across the country,” the CPP said.

Traditionally implemented by the CPP and the NPA, Yuletide ceasefire declarations are sometimes reciprocated by the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP), particularly during formal and back-channel peace negotiations with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP).

The last CPP Christmas ceasefire declaration was on December 25 and 26, 2023 following simultaneous announcements weeks earlier by the Ferdinand Marcos Jr. government and the NDFP of discussions trying to revive formal peace negotiations.

It was not reciprocated by the AFP, instead ordering continued military operations against the NPA.

The GRP has yet to respond to this year’s ceasefire declaration by the CPP.

Founded in December 26, 1968, the CPP is set to celebrate its 57th founding anniversary next week.

Marcos Jr., during his State of the Nation Address (SONA) last July, ordered his government’s security forces to eliminate the NPA once and for all by year’s end.

The AFP reported earlier this year that there are zero active NPA guerilla fronts left in the country, marking GRP’s strategic victory over the underground revolutionary army.

A series of armed encounters between the AFP and the NPA ensued across the country after the president’s SONA however, proving his claims were false.

Last Saturday, another armed encounter between the NPA and the 8th Infantry Division of the Philippines Army happened in San Jose de Buan in Samar, the CPP reported.

The clash resulted in the death of two government troopers reportedly belonging to the Military Intelligence Battalion of the said AFP unit.

NPA-Western Samar spokesperson Tirado Dagohoy reported one NPA fighter sustained a minor injury and “easily evaded the enemy.”

The CPP said that during their four-day ceasefire, all Red commanders and Red fighters must remain on high alert against “treacherous ground and aerial attacks of the AFP.”

“They must work closely with the masses, and must be ever ready to maneuver or counter-attack, when necessitated by the situation,” it said.

The CPP also enjoined units of the NPA and local peasant organizations to conduct cultural and education activities in time for CPP’s anniversary.

The group said the temporary ceasefire order is being issued in solidarity with the Filipino people as they conduct simple celebrations of their traditional holidays “amid grave social and economic conditions.”

# (Raymund B. Villanueva, reporting in Kathmandu, Nepal)